Why Averaging Down Is Dangerous for Trend Followers?

Averaging down is a common practice in trading and investing. The idea is simple: when the price of an asset you bought declines, you buy more to lower the average purchase price. Traders who average down typically believe they are:

• Buying the asset at a “cheaper” price

• Lowering their average cost

• Positioning themselves for bigger profits when the price rebounds

• Trusting that the market is “wrong” and the asset will eventually recover

While this logic might seem reasonable—especially from a value-investing perspective—trend followers view it very differently.

In fact, many of the world’s most successful trend followers—Ed Seykota, Richard Dennis, Paul Tudor Jones, and others—strongly reject the idea of averaging down. Paul Tudor Jones even popularized the famous warning: “Losers average losers.” This phrase highlights a critical truth: adding to a losing position is one of the worst decisions a trend follower can make.

So, what makes averaging down such a flawed strategy for trend followers? Here are the key reasons.

At the heart of trend following lies one simple rule: buy strength and exit weakness. Averaging down is the complete opposite—it forces you to increase exposure to an asset that is clearly demonstrating weakness.

Trend followers rely on objective price action, not personal belief or hope. When prices fall, it signals that the trend is weakening or reversing. Adding more at this point means ignoring the most important information the market is giving you: the trend is not on your side.

Even worse, averaging down makes your portfolio more heavily weighted toward positions that are already proving you wrong. A true trend follower does the reverse—cut losses quickly and allocate capital to positions that are moving in their favor. Averaging down is a direct violation of this philosophy.

2. Averaging Down Expands Risk Exponentially While Offering Limited Reward

1. Averaging Down Opposes the Core Principle of Trend Following

When you average down, you are increasing the size of a losing position. If the price continues to fall (and in many cases it does), your losses will grow at an accelerating rate. Trend followers understand that any asset can fall farther, faster, and more irrationally than expected.

Meanwhile, the potential reward does not increase proportionally. Lowering the average price doesn't change market structure. Price still needs to climb and break through multiple resistance levels just to get back near breakeven. In other words, you take big risk for limited upside—a terrible exchange from a risk–reward perspective.

Trend following takes the opposite approach: positions with small initial risk can evolve into large winners as the trend strengthens.
Averaging down flips this logic on its head: risk grows bigger, reward stays small.

• Averaging down contradicts the core principle of trend following, which is to follow strength and avoid weakness.

• Adding to a losing position greatly increases risk, while offering limited additional reward.

• Averaging down traps traders in emotional biases, weakening discipline and objectivity.

• One bad averaging-down position can damage the entire risk structure, wiping out many winning trades.

• Trend followers do the opposite: cut losses quickly, let winners run, and add only when price moves in their favor (averaging up).

If you want to learn how professional trend followers read price action, ride strong trends, and avoid destructive pitfalls like averaging down,
join the TrendMatrix program today.

Build a trading approach that is disciplined, objective, and built for long-term consistency across all market conditions.
👉 It’s time to trade smarter, more systematically, and with true trend-following confidence. Click here!

Key Takeaway

3. Averaging Down Triggers Emotional Biases and Breaks Objectivity

Averaging down often stems from emotions: refusing to admit you are wrong, wanting to defend your initial analysis, or fearing small losses. This opens the door to dangerous cognitive biases like confirmation bias, loss aversion, and sunk cost fallacy.

Successful trend followers know that objectivity and discipline are their greatest assets. Averaging down invites emotional entanglement that clouds judgment. Instead of cutting losing positions quickly, traders get trapped deeper—hoping for a reversal rather than responding to what the price is showing.

Worse, as more capital gets locked into a losing trade, traders lose the flexibility needed to follow their system. Portfolios become skewed: small winners and large losers. Trend following requires the reverse—small losers, big winners.

4. Averaging Down Destroys System Structure and Long-Term Expectancy

Trend-following systems are designed to produce long-term profitability through outlier trends—big winners that make up for many small losses. Averaging down destroys this structure. A losing position that keeps growing can wipe out the gains of 20–30 successful trades.

This is why legendary trend followers emphasize keeping losses small. One bad averaging-down decision can collapse the entire risk framework of your trading system.

Trend followers do the exact opposite of averaging down: they average up—adding to positions that the market has already confirmed as winners. This preserves risk while allowing profits to scale with the trend.

Conclusion: Averaging Down Is Not for Trend Followers

Averaging down may look appealing for some market participants, but for trend followers it is a psychological and financial trap. It violates the core philosophy of following strength, amplifies risk, heightens emotional bias, and breaks the long-term structure of a trend-following system.

The masters of trend following reject averaging down for a reason: trading success is not about being right—it’s about following price, managing risk, and letting strong trends grow naturally.

For true trend followers, the rule is simple:
Cut your losses short, let your winners run — and never average a loser.